Af Lone Nørgaard.
NewSpeek vælger at give artiklen The deadly initial Spring 2020 Covid wave et selvstændigt opslag, fordi artiklen argumenterer for, hvad vi længe har haft en mistanke om: Det store dødstal i Norditalien – og andre steder – var ikke corona-relateret, men udløst af ”sundhedspolitik”: De gamle skulle slås ihjel på den ene eller anden måde.
Er lægestanden efterhånden sammen med journalister og politikere den profession, vi skal frygte mest? Altså med lysende undtagelser som Peter McCullough, John Campbell , Roger Hodkinson m.fl. – herunder Kristian Løkkegaard?
Det må være tilladt at stille spørgsmålet, også selv om der er mange grader mellem ren fejhed, autoritetstro, usselt mammon og medicinske eksperimenter a la Mengele. Læs sidste del af Sidse Kærsgaards historie – omhandlende den danske lægestand, der dybest set er noget galt med.
***
The deadly initial Spring 2020 Covid wave
The iatrogenesis hypothesis
Af Norman Fenton and Martin Neil
It has long been hypothesised that deadly health policies were a major factor in the wave of deaths attributed to covid in the Spring of 2020. This is also referred to as the iatrogenesis hypothesis.
Jonathan Engler looked at what had happened in Lombardy, Italy and concluded that many of the “deaths which occurred in the aftermath of the cataclysmic changes to the delivery of healthcare — especially of the frail and elderly — might have been caused by policy, rather than virus.”
Anna Farrow made a similar convincing case that this happened in Canada while @NellyTells reports it was happening in Spain.
Likewise, there has been a long-term concern that excessive use of Midazolam was a contributing factor in the UK and the Daily Mail newspaper reported on it as long ago as July 2020.
(…)
Resten af artiklen kan læses her.