Af Lone Nørgaard.
Vi håber selvfølgelig på nye læsere efter defameringen af mig i Berlingske (dårlig omtale er som bekendt bedre end ingen omtale!) og vores modreplik – så for dem, der endnu ikke måtte kende Mattias Desmet, følger her først en opsummering af hans analyse, derpå en uddybet fremstilling af teorien ved en anden kending, Dr. Robert Malone.
Studies suggest that mass formation follows a general distribution:
- 30% are brainwashed, hypnotized, indoctrinated by the group narrative
- 40% in the middle are persuadable and may follow if no worthy alternative is perceived
- 30% fight against the narrative.
Those that rebel and fight against the narrative, become the enemy of the brainwashed and a primary target of aggression.
One of the the best ways to counter mass formation is for those against the narrative to continue to speak out against it, which serves to help break the hypnosis of some in the brainwashed group as well as persuade the persuadable middle to choose reason over mindlessness.
Dr. Desmet suggests that for something as big as COVID-19, the only way to break the mass formation psychosis is to give the crowd something bigger to focus on. He believes that totalitarianism may be that bigger issue. Of course, after COVID-19, global totalitarianism may be the biggest issue of our time.
[Så tilhører du de 30 procent, der er vågne og af al magt forsøger at gennemhulle narrativet (læs: løgnen), er der altså en opgave at løfte. Ikke noget med at putte sig – ud og tag kampen. Fx ved at droppe mundbleen alias symbolet på underkastelse?]
MASS FORMATION PSYCHOSIS or… mass hypnosis- the madness of crowds
Af Robert Malone.
As many of you know, I have spent time researching and speaking about mass psychosis theory. Most of what I have learned has come from Dr. Mattias Desmet, who realized that this form of mass hypnosis, of the madness of crowds, can account for the strange phenomenon of about 20-30% of the population in the western world becoming entranced with the Noble Lies and dominant narrative concerning the safety and effectiveness of the genetic vaccines, and both propagated and enforced by politicians, science bureaucrats, pharmaceutical companies and legacy media.
Resten af artiklen kan læses her.
Og her linket til den video, der også opsummer teorien.