Af Lone Nørgaard.
Definitionen på et paradigmeskifte er ret enkel: En revolutionerende ændring af de grundlæggende antagelser og principper inden for en videnskab – en markant ændring af en opfattelse eller praksis.
Stadig flere sætter i dag spørgsmålstegn ved den ’lærdom’ og de doktriner, de er blevet undervist i i diverse uddannelsessystemer. Ikke bare det danske, men over hele jorden.
Blandt disse har jeg i dette opslag udvalgt tre centrale personer, Mark Gober, Iain McGilchrist og Steven A. Young, der alle bidrager til en langt mere dybtgående forståelse af vores verden. Fra hver deres vinkel sætter de forklarende ord på, hvorfor menneskers virkelighedsforståelse og perception er så forskellig.
For dem alle gælder det, at sandheden er navigationspunkt, og især Young vil blive opfattet som kontroversiel.
MARK GOBER
Jeg blev opmærksom på Mark Gober via Jerm Warfares hjemmeside: Mark Gober on everything being upside down og har flere gange henvist til ham. Han forekommer uhyre troværdig.
Mark Gober, a partner at a Silicon Valley investment bank and strategy firm, has authored numerous similarly themed books, each titled An End To Upside Down To [theme].
Et eksempel:
Fra introen på Jerms hjemmeside:
His fascination with life’s big questions began during his time as a Princeton undergrad. He studied psychology and behavioural economics, focusing on human judgement and decision-making. Basically, he thinks deeply about the world around us and how all the puzzle pieces fit into one another.
He dived into the concept of ‘everything being upside down’ and how the COVID era has helped many people open their eyes and see the world differently. Mark touched on the causes of illness, consciousness, health, government roles, materialism and AI.]
***
IAIN MCGILCHRIST
En anden vigtig skikkelse er Iain McGilchrist, der vil være kendt for NewSpeeks faste følgere (læs her og her). Der ligger en lang række videoer med ham på YouTube, fx
A Divided Brain and an Addicted World: The Missing Link?
Iain McGilchrist: How faith can re-enchant a left-brained world (youtube.com)
For de travle anbefaler jeg den første.
***
STEVEN A. YOUNG
Den sidste stemme tilhører Dr. Steven A. Young, Master of Science, PhD i teoretisk fysik, filosof, musiker og alkymist.
Hans navn dukkede op i en samtale med Steve Falconer (om Falconer jf. her og her), og da Falconer ligesom Mike Yeadon er en mand, jeg over tid har fattet pæn tillid til, kastede jeg mig ud i at lytte til den over to timer lange samtale.
Steven A. Young var et så interessant bekendtskab, at jeg besluttede mig for at købe hans bog A FOOL’S WISDOM Science Conspiracies & The Secret Art of Alchemy (udkom d. 1. april 2024!). I parentes bemærket henviser han her til en godt otte timer lang video What on Earth Happened by Ewaranon, der mere eller mindre flugter med hans egne analyser.
I bogen gør Young op med videnskaben som religion, med ’scientism’. Her følger en række citater fra Del 1: Science Conspiracies.
CITATMOSAIK
There are five main belief systems that form the foundation of all modern scientism. Beware now, these are sacred cows that must never be questioned or criticized in ‘the inverted world’, you will more than likely be deemed a fool, alienated by your family, kicked out of your job, and uninvited from social activities for even talking about this stuff, you have been warned!!”
OK so let’s continue. The five elemental theories that comprise the world view of scientism are:
- Atomism (atomic, nuclear, quantum & particle physics)
- Gravity (Newton, Einstein, Hawking etc)
- Heliocentrism (Copernicus, Galileo etc)
- Evolution (Darwin, ‘from goo to you by way of the zoo’)
- Germ Theory (Pasteur, Rockefeller, ‘germs cause disease’)
The numbering used in this list is not arbitrary either, it represents the order of thought and the chronology of their ideation [ideernes tilblivelse].” (s. 33)
“When false information is contrived for the purposes of hiding true information, this is Occultism. (s. 5)
“The term “conspiracy theorist” was created by the CIA as a smear to dehumanize independent people who conduct research and investigate truth.” (s. 11)
“(…) government is the business of mind control and population management.” (s. 15)
“In general, only the very worst people get to the top position, they are not elected, they are selected, and there is nothing honourable about it.” (s. 23)
“Physics, and indeed all the sciences have been commandeered by counterintelligence operatives and are used to control and misdirect the public on matters of power, healing, transformation and the true nature of the realm we live in.” (s. 26)
“A characteristic of sophistry is that it always asks us to reject the evidence of our senses.” (s. 30)
“Electrons, protons, neutrons are all conjecture, they are invented in the human mind and given as technical explanations for the elemental phenomena of fire, air, earth and water.” (s. 38)
“From where I stand, the real nuclear war is the war against the nuclear family (…)” (s. 46)
“(…) eventually I came to a place of 100% knowing that our world is not a planet spinning through space.” (s. 52)
“Earth is not a planet.
Earth is not at star and it’s not wandering (s. 58)
“space exploration is a lie.” (s. 72)
[Her på linje med Steve Falconer on NASA, SpaceX, and space fakery]
- Every picture / video / model of the globe earth is a fabrication.
- The north pole is the centre of the realm, not the sun.
- Antartica is an ice shelf surrounding the ‘edge of the puddle’. (s. 76-77)
All that would be needed to prove the globe would be to film the horizon while going straight up in a balloon.” (s. 79)
“Relativity is not reality, and absolute truth exists absolutely.” (s. 82)
“(…) without gravity the Copernican model of the spinning globe earth and the Heliocentric solar system fall apart along with the entire field of astrophysics and the whole state-sanctioned history of the universe, the big bang, the explanations of stars and galaxies, the planetary globe model and even the theory of evolution – all of it collapses like a house of cards.” (s. 89)
“(…) viruses are pure conjecture and this has been exposed by a great many brave doctors now.” (s. 98) [Jf. her og her]
***
HVAD SKAL MAN TRO OM FLAD(ERE)JORD-TEORIEN?
Hvad skal man tro? En vens reaktion kommer her:
”Jeg føler mig ude af stand til at bedømme, om vores verden er rund eller flad. Jeg kan ikke forstå, omsætte eller benytte/afvise de matematiske, fysiske eller logiske argumenter, som begge sider præsenterer.
Men noget i mig hælder til den flade jord, til at vores verden ikke er en globe af to grunde:
1. Jeg har ikke tillid til noget af det, jeg er blevet fortalt, lært eller undervist fra mainstream eller myndigheder, så hvorfor skulle det være sandt, at de hårdnakket påstår, at vores jord er en rund kugle, der svæver i et uendeligt ingenting?
2. Hvorfor skulle folk ved deres fulde fem ønske at udsætte sig selv for latterliggørelse, hån og udstødelse ved stædig at fastholde og fremlægge et verdenssyn, der er i opposition til det vedtagne narrativ, hvis ikke de helt og holdent tror fuldt ud på, at deres overbevisning er sand?”
***
Jeg vil opfordre læseren af dette opslag til at anskaffe sig bogen samt gennemse dokumentaren What on Earth Happened by Ewaranon.
Under det sædvanlige motto: LÆS, LYT OG DØM SELV.
***
PERSPEKTIVERING
Opvågningens negative bivirkninger & modgiften
En knapt to år gammel artikel, men mere relevant end nogensinde.
***
