Af Lone Nørgaard.
UGE 12
NewSpeek lægger indlæg op 2-5 gange om ugen.
I BLANDEDE BOLSJER forsøger jeg at sætte op tematisk. Særligt interessante links bliver sat øverst. Du behøver ikke være enig i valgene.
Så vælg ud, læs, lyt og døm selv!
NewSpeek kan kontaktes på kontakt@newspeek.info, hvis man ønsker at støtte platformen på den ene eller anden måde.
***
***
Fiona Rose Diamond: EXPLOSIVE: The Bill Gates Case: The Narrative on Trial. Amsterdam Court Of Appeal. The Netherlands. March 2026
***
Put Your Phone Down NOW! – Icke Renegade
***
Derfor skal du som “vågen” lade være med at stemme på Lars Boje
***
NEW WORLD ORDER / TECHNOCRACY RISING
Meet The Ellisons: Zionists, Technocrats, Moguls
***
***
***
The Illuminati formed 250 years ago in Bavaria.
Their goals were:
1) Revenge
2) Enacting biblical prophecy
3) Instituting a worldwide totalitarian system
In order to achieve these goals they planned three world wars.
Albert Pike, an American 33rd Degree Scottish Rite Freemason, wrote about these wars in a letter in 1871. Pike had been an officier in the Confederate Army and may have helped found the Klan.
He is most famous for writing Morals and Dogma, which is like the Bible of Freemasonry.
Pike said that the First World War would be fomented by Illuminati agents in Britain and Germany.
The goal was to eliminate the Russian Czar and to establish Communism.
The Second World War would be fomented between the fascists and the Zionists.
Its goal was to establish a Zionist state in Palestine and to empower communism to begin to diminish Christianity.
The third world war would be fomented between the Zionists and the Islamic world.
The goal of this war is the mutual destruction of the three major religions, as well as the economic and spiritual exhaustion of all the world’s people.
This would be accompanied by the rise of “atheists” (the AI technocrats?).
Pike says these atheists will provoke a social cataclysm which will reveal the true savagery of nihilism. The people will rise up to overthrow them.
At this point the multitudes will be ready to receive the true philosophy of Lucifer, the god of this world, which will no longer be gate-kept behind secret societies like the Freemasons.
Presumably, at that point, the Illuminati will no longer have to hide, but will show themselves publicly as our rulers.
The world will be united under one government, seated in Rome.
And it will be united by one religion, seated in Jerusalem.
The Third Temple will be restored, and people will offer sacrifices to Baal again.
(Ingen kilde – tilsendt i en tråd)
***
***
VACCINER, FORGIFTNING, HJERNEVASK
***
***
The Clintons, Charlie Kirk & The Wikipedia SCAM of the Century EXPOSED
***
***
***
IRAN-ISRAEL
The Iran War Is A DIRECT ASSAULT On The U.S. Food Supply! – Catherine Austin-Fitts
Ved ca. minut 39 fortæller Catherine Austin-Fitts om alle de ting, vi kan gå til modstand med. Ikke mindst: BRUG KONTANTER!
***
White House in PANIC mode as Iran narrative COLLAPSES, Iran slams Israel in MASSIVE strike
***
***
Iran er påskud for det nye totalitære globale penge- og kontrolsystem
***
***
The Epstein, ‘City Of London’, War With Iran – Is It All A Great Game?
***
Israel crumbling, Bibi missing, American bases leveled. What they won’t tell you on the news.
***
***
USA og Israel koordinerte angrepet på Irans gassfelt South Pars
***
DIVERSE
Who was Nicholas Rockefeller: ANSWERED!!! – Questions For Corbett
***
Dismantling the ‘three camps of awareness’ nonsense (Jerm Warfare)
Mike Yeadon [har nedenstående kommentar till sammenstødet mellem Jerm og David]:
I didn’t realise that Jerm (aka Jeremy Nell) writes on his own website.
I found this out because someone pointed out that Jerm had written a rebuttal of David A Hughes’ criticism of Jerm. Thanks David, had you not, I might have been limited to following Jerm through his Jerm Warfare podcast channel.
I agree with Jerm’s argument here, that an influencing model consisting of a mere three categories unhelpfully constrains the way many people will regard commentators. I missed that because, I you know and have restated, I much prefer to keep shooting at those who are unquestionably plotting to harm us. My general response to behaviour that prompts me to seriously doubt a person’s integrity is to stop communicating with them. There are rare exceptions, almost always towards those who’ve worked hard to reinforce the very psyop that we are battling (because Virus Lie + Contagion Lie = Vaccine Lie).
I did previously comment in relation to David A Hughes that I had not hitherto had reason to be other than content to be in the trenches (as Jerm puts it) alongside him.
I was however confused by David’s condemnatory piece about Reiner Fuellmich. Fuellmich has been in jail since before Hughes turned up on the post-2020 scene. Nothing has happened recently in relation to Fuellmich which might justify new scrutiny. Hughes’ approach to the question of Fuellmich’s conviction was oddly monocular, resting as it did largely on the written judgement.
Anyone who doesn’t realise that all institutions without exception have been captured, weaponised or muted could not in all seriousness take what a judge says as the most important information in evaluating such a matter.
So, why this target? Why now? And why this approach? All three questions left me scratching my head. However perhaps, unknown to me, David might have had interactions with Reiner or been influenced by things he said or guests he had on the Corona Investigative Committee. I parked the thought that this seemed a peculiar thing, concluding Reiner probably was guilty.
I did say, tongue in cheek that, if three camps, why not four?
I theorised that an optimal member of a Camp 4 would be someone who arrives late to the scene (so that Camp 3 members would be well established), brings a compelling story so that it would be easy to “do the rounds” (be interviewed widely) and be remembered, and then begin to criticise mostly the members of Camp 3, the better for fomenting discord and distracting them from their work.
I didn’t say I had concluded that David A Hughes was the first occupant of a possible Camp 4. It did cross my mind, though.
This new criticism of Jerm however has moved my assessment that he might be up a notch.
As I said then, in relation to David A Hughes piece on Reiner that “It will be interesting to see what he does next”. It remains interesting.
I haven’t said anything I wouldn’t say to David. I don’t want him to do anything other than what he thinks is appropriate. The environment is so “target rich” that there is a long list of important matters on which he could very effectively deploy his considerable talents. (min fremhævelse, LN, som jeg er enig i. Uanset min dybe respekt for David A. Hughes).
***
PÅ POSITIV-SIDEN / HUMOR / MODSTAND
Militærnektergruppe i USA: Telefonen ‘ringer uavbrutt’ mens en stor mobilisering pågår
***
MAGA MUTINY: Joe Kent Resigns in Protest of War for Israel
***
***
***
The Great Refusal Has Begun – med denne kommentar af Mike Yeadon:
Unusually, I don’t recommend you watch this. I think it’s sincere and thoughtful, I share it because something that’s probably obvious to many others has only just crystallised forcefully in my mind.
Remember former KGB officer, Yuri Bezmanov, who defected in the 1980s (…)? He gave a rather famous TV interview in which he explained how the Soviet covert services planned to destroy their adversaries. In brief, he described a four part plan which causes a society to collapse from within. A vital element in this plan was to produce a state of complete demoralisation in the populace.
I’ve been aware for several years of a long run plan to destroy The West, a plan which has been in operation since long before I was born (1960) which, however, went throttle up, hard, around that date.
The difference between observing that it feels like everything has gone to hell and that which has not is getting its shoes on, and understanding that this is all by design is of course devastating.
That realisation, too, is intentional, because it contributes to the goal of demoralisation.
Why have I posted this, then?
It is to make the point that demoralisation is an objective all of its own. It’s not merely a consequence of numerous other things.
Realising this adds another string to our bows, those of us who are not willing to be merely passive onlookers to the destruction of everything we held to be important.
That revolutionary act is not to become demoralised.
Much easier said than done, but much more likely to be accomplished if you understand the usefulness to the Useless Eliters of the loss of your morale.
A demoralised people are much less likely to fight, in any of the meanings of that word.
It is prompting me to consider the ways in which, through a conscious effort, I will refuse to become demoralised.
The release of the so-called Epstein files is intended to have exactly the same effect.
Similarly, allowing more people to realise what has been done to us over the last few years to precisely no official response is another big one.
The coarsening of the organs and works of the state is yet another.
***
***
Conclusion [på David A. Hughes analyse i “Covid-19,’“ Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy, Volume 2]
Manufacturing Compliance
Reliance on Public Acquiescence; Rule Following; Internalising New Behaviours; Public Transport; Maladaptation; Waning Compliance; Omicron; Learned Helplessness; Accepting the Unacceptable
———————————–
Notwithstanding the impact of those who did resist, the obedience training was powerful and largely successful in 2020/2021. Most people simply went along with what they were told to do, no matter how ridiculous, degrading, unscientific, or harmful to themselves and others.
It did not take long before the public had been conditioned to accept a range of anti-human behavioural modifications, including queueing two metres apart (even if meant vulnerable people standing outside in the cold), following traffic light systems to get into supermarkets, wearing masks, sanitising hands, robotically following one-way systems, and suffering the indignity of having a (typically young) employee provide instructions about how to shop in store. It was orchestrated insanity, and the majority went along with it.
The power of propaganda and of the law was enough to get the masses to do as they were told in the first instance. But even when legal requirements were dropped and measures were formally rescinded, the internalised norms of the “new normal” meant that people continued to display maladaptive behaviours and learned helplessness. They had been trained to behave a certain way.
The concern going forwards is whether the majority will simply fall back into behaving like trained animals in the event that a future “lockdown” is declared (and it could be an “energy lockdown” or a “climate lockdown”). Is Halpern right that the public will “know what the drill is” (Investigations Team, 2023)? Has a dangerous precedent been set which normalises the unacceptable?
Or will enough people learn the power of non-compliance, so that they no longer need to live like dogs doing their master’s bidding?
***