NewSpeek

DU GLEMTE AT NÆVNE DE FRANSKE OFFICERER

RichardBlack
Del artiklen her:

[NewSpeek bringer nedenfor Flemming Møllers mail til Lasse Berg Sørensen. Overskriften er Flemming Møllers] 

***

Hej Lasse Berg Sørensen,

Med henvisning til din artikel med overskriften Militæranalytiker om tab af Azovstal-stålværket: Mariupol er et evigt minde  tillader jeg mig at henvise til den amerikanske senator og pensionerede militær mand, Richard H. Black, med det han kom frem med for ca. 3 uger siden.

Man kan læse HELE interviewet som transskription her. 

Se venligst Col. Richard Black: U.S. Leading World to Nuclear War 

som alternativt også findes bl.a. her U.S. leading world to nuclear war: Mike Billington interviews colonel Richard H. Black. 

Konkret hvad jeg mener er fra minuttal 41:30 https://youtu.be/dcp0TYx_eUI?t=2490 hvor Richard H. Black siger, citat:

“Where, for example, the Turkish media just published an article saying that at Mariupol, where there was a great siege, that the Russians ultimately won. The one area they haven’t taken over is this tremendous steel plant. There are a lot of Ukrainian soldiers who are holed up there. And now it has come to light that apparently there are 50 French senior officers, who are trapped in that steel plant along with the Ukrainians. The French soldiers have been on the ground fighting, directing the battle. And this was kept under wraps, ultra-secret, because of the French elections that just occurred. Had the French people known that there were a large number of French officers trapped and probably going to die in that steel plant, the elections would have gone the other way: Marine Le Pen would have won. And so it was very important that for the entire deep state, that it not come to light that these French officers were there.”, citat slut. 

Som ufrivillig betaler af din journalistløn er det smerteligt, hvor dårlig research eller endnu værre, muligvis forudindtaget du er i denne artikel, som har utallige mangler og egentlige fejl.

Det er uklædeligt og kan enten forklares med enten ikke ordentlig journalistisk faglighed, eller at man har fået besked på at opfinde et bestemt narrativ til lejligheden, som så helt konkret ikke passer med virkeligheden.

Det er IKKE journalistik men propaganda!

Med venlig hilsen

Flemming Møller

Del artiklen her:
Exit mobile version